L. B. Puntel is known for his magnum opus 'structure and being' (2006). Here are some papers in English and German that can be regarded as preliminary research for 'structure and being'.

New group metaphysics blog. Contributors include: John Heil, Jonathan Lowe, kit, Ned Markosian, Jonathan Jacobs, Jennifer McKitrick, L.A. Paul, Robbie Williams, Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Jessica Wilson, Dan López de Sa, Karen Bennett, Gabriele Contessa, Elizabeth Barnes, Ross Cameron, Thomas Hofweber, and Jonathan Schaffer.

If some claim is indeterminately true, then either there is something that makes that claim indeterminately true or there is not. If there is something that makes the claim indeterminately true, then what kind of thing is this indeterminate truth maker? Ross Cameron has some ideas.

A fun paper by Ted Sider arguing, from vagueness, that a certain conception of Hell is inconsistent with attributes that God is traditionally thought to have.

Interesting argument for the conclusion that persons do not have greater moral standing than non-persons.

Alexander Pruss argues what he thinks is the most plausible version of universalism raises a problem of the many. He goes on to suggest that this may have implications for psychological theories of personal identity.

Philosophical Books has put together what promises to be a good Symposium of Merrick's new book.

I address an intuition commonly endorsed by metaphysicians, that there must be a fundamental layer
of reality, i.e., that chains of ontological dependence must terminate: there cannot be turtles all the
way down. I discuss applications of this intuition with reference to Bradley’s regress, composition,
realism about the mental and the cosmological argument. I discuss some arguments for the intui-
tion, but argue that they are unconvincing.

Controversial discussion about the role of armchair theorizing and conceptual analysis in metaphysics in particular and philosophy in general.

Ned Markosian defends presentism from some of the main objections. It's also a nice clear summary of the debates surrounding eternalism and presentism.