Just a heads up. I now have all of the journals survey/data table combos posted. Head on over and submit a survey about your most recent journal submissions.

Which philosophical terms do you think do more to obscure than clarify?Some terms are ambiguous in ways that invite (unintentional) equivocation, e.g. 'autonomy' and 'intrinsic value'. While safely usable in some contexts, I think it's often preferable to replace these vague terms with whatever more precise understanding you have in mind.

This page has all the classics, plus three new tracks from the 21st Century Monads.

Gualtiero Piccinini (Missouri/St. Louis) writes: I’d love to see philosophers discuss open access philosophy journals. Some observations: (1) In many sciences, some of the most prestigious journals are now open access. (2) In philosophy, only one open access journal (Philosophers’...Brian Leiter

Jonathan Weinberg’s symposium piece on Williamson’s book is now published online in Phil Studies. Williamson’s response is here.

Joshua Cohen and Thomas Nagel, in an extremely interesting piece, discuss at length John Rawls' Senior (B.A.) thesis, and its relation to his later work. Rawls' religion, it seems, had a lot of influence on his later work, despite his altered views on faith after the war.

Find out how views in the profession break down on key issues, and also how we *think* the profession breaks down...

Alex Rosenberg's "précis of an argument that naturalism forces upon us a very disillusioned 'take' on reality."

A nice discussion of MA programs in philosophy and who they are for.

Just like the title says