This post has various advice about publishing as a graduate student. Some might consider this common knowledge but I suspect it is worth reading anyway. For example, it can't hurt to be reminded that "Rejections are a natural part of the process. Anybody who submits nontrivial work to philosophy journals gets rejections."

"Hey, Gödel---we're compiling a comprehensive list of fetishes. What turn's you on?" "Anything not on your list."

Mark Kalderon's got the right idea. Philosophers should be sharing BibTeX files, and Kalderon has an easy method to do it. [HT: Brad Weslake]

This post has links to two guides to publishing aimed at graduate students. Much of this overlaps with a previous scoop but there is some new stuff and in any case said differently...

David Chalmers and David Bourget are working on a taxonomy of philosophy in order to assist in tracking online papers in philosophy. Seems like a very worthwhile endeavor to significantly improve online philosophy resources. Check out the explanation and call for feedback here.

If the comments get going on this, could be useful for those on the market.

Brooks on journal rankings from Australia. Hat tip Leiter.

In this post titled "Discoveries Merely About Concepts" Wo discusses a disagreement between Frank Jackson and Timothy Williamson over what it is that Gettier discovered with his classic counterexamples to the JTB analysis of knowledge.

John Basl just created a quick guide to Sympoze for new users. It explains how to use some of the core features of Sympoze. A nice guide for beginners and interested philosophers that are not as familiar with social bookmarking websites. Thanks John!

Shen-yi Laio considers intuition more in response to Weatherson's "Intuition isn’t Unreliable" on the Michigan Grad Students' blog, Go Grue!