If some claim is indeterminately true, then either there is something that makes that claim indeterminately true or there is not. If there is something that makes the claim indeterminately true, then what kind of thing is this indeterminate truth maker? Ross Cameron has some ideas.

Kalynne Pudner just brought this post to my attention. Pretty funny. The last few tips are my favorite.

Harry Brighouse has a great post about the purpose of grades in the academic institution and a discussion of whether there is a case to be made for grade inflation over the past few decades.

Weatherson has posted detailed notes from an upper level decision theory course. I haven't looked through them in any detail but I love when philosophers do this (Strevens notes on confirmation theory are great).

Barry Smith on recent developments in Neuroscience and what these mean for phil. mind.

A reflection attempting to understand the Christian notion of "spiritual disciples" by utilizing some basic tools of "possible worlds" semantics.

This post asks if in teaching modern philosophy to undergrads we should stop focusing on M&E and start focusing on the ethical and socio-political debates because these debates are largely still relevant and more interesting to undergrads. I assume this will agitate some modern philosophers. Bonus: A nice comment is already there to kick things off...

A quote from the story: "I'll try then to make the secular case: that the human-centered values and rights which we see today as universal, eternal, and even self-evident have actually grown out of our recent past - and were influenced by how we did science."

This blog is widely read by scientists and science minded people. I often think that it would do some good to have lots of careful philosophers reading the blog and commenting...You'll see why when you read the post.

Hellie asks whether the philosophical lexicon has the potential to marginalize good philosophers because it can be used as a guide to the inner circle of philosophy but the content tends to be unbalanced.

The comments could be good.

Discussion about the relevance of (experimental) conceptual analysis of folk concepts to philosophical issues like free will.