This is a great idea. Richard gives us a nice concise summary of his blogging in 2008.

Interesting post over at Certain Doubts by Ralph Wedgwood

These post-docs will not be in JFP!

Standard math and logic derives from the insight (of Cantor) that simple infinities might be actual infinities, for all we know, but no less possible epistemically is the similarly Realistic metaphysical possibility that simple infinities are indefinitely extensible. That possibility coheres well with the (ancient Indian) idea of the number of points in a line of points being 1/0. This 2005 paper reintroduces that idea (in a more Cantorian style, for ease of philosophical comparison).

Finaly points to two claims of a moral error theory: (1) that moral judgments presuppose that moral value has absolute authority (we think we are making absolutely true claims when we make moral judgments), and (2) that this presupposition is false. Finlay accepts (2), but denies that (1) is the best explanation of moral practices.

Interesting synopsis of an experiment that Martha Nussbaum appealed to in order to argue that feelings of disgust-responses do not reliably track whether or not something is immoral.

Weatherson has posted detailed notes from an upper level decision theory course. I haven't looked through them in any detail but I love when philosophers do this (Strevens notes on confirmation theory are great).

Review of Mill biography

This post deals with issues of personhood, intuitions, and reflective equilibrium. It's an interesting exchange worth the look.

This is an old article by Mackie, citing some passages from Locke's Essay which seem to anticipate some things Kripke says about natural kind terms in Naming and Necessity. Locke, it seems, ends up rejecting what Kripke will eventually say about natural kind terms.